Rusteberg’s 50”
Muskie Equation
Factoring In the Probability You Will Catch a 50”
Muskie
By: Steven James Rusteberg
N* fl ft na fh ff fc fb = N (the # of 50” Muskie
in your boat)
(You do the Math!)
In my spare time, while ice covers the water, all I
do is think about muskie. It has become an obsession
of mine. I think about big fish. I think about catching
more big fish., and I think about how I can up my odds
at landing the muskie of a lifetime. One can say I live
and breathe the muskie. The above mathematical formula
is a great example of how much free time I must have
to obsess about the fish. When I finished this formula
I took a step back and wondered. I found it amazing
that fifty-inch muskie are even caught at all. The fish
is so rare, and the circumstances pertaining to its
capture are so statically poor. The mathematical variables
make it very unlikely that anyone can catch one of these
beasts. But every year, more and more anglers are successful.
I want to be one of those anglers… thus the formula.
Putting the odds in your favor is a big step towards
this goal. This formula will help you better understand
your success and failure in the sport of muskellunge
fishing.
I have developed this formula for those of you that
obsess about the fish as much as I do. The formula is
precise when the right numbers plugged into it, but
one may never know some of the existing variables that
each factor pertains to. The formula is linear, meaning
one factor will have a direct effect on another. When
calculating some of the variables we can only guess,
to the precise number. Different numbers and fractions
will give you different answers. I built this to make
you think. Are you fishing the right lakes? Are you
putting in the hours on quality spots? Are you giving
yourself the best odds at being a successful angler?
Study it first! Then put you numbers into the formula.
The formula will really make you think about your odds
of landing that “fish of a lifetime”. Use
it like “Luke Skywalker” used “the
force” and become a more successful muskie angler.
N*= the number of bodies of water
(lakes, streams, rivers, creeks, and ponds) with a muskie
population in North America.
In my study in order to write
this article I have gotten many answers to this question.
Some professionals estimate this number to be somewhere
around 5,000 others as many as 25,000. Whatever your
value for this factor is you must include every stream,
rivers, creeks, and ponds with muskie swimming in them.
In Vilas County Wisconsin alone, there are over two
hundred six known muskie lakes. This numbers don’t
even take into consideration the tributaries connected
to those lakes, that inevitably, muskie inhabit .We
must remember that some don’t have what we would
call a “fishable muske population”. That
is… a body of water worth fishing…or better
put … one worth putting forth the effort to fish
for a muskie. Even though they may not be bodies of
waters we would choose to fish, it must be included
into the formula for accuracy. For “N*”
put into the formula how many bodies of water you think
contain at least one muskie.
fl= the fraction of bodies of water with a fifty-inch
muskie population in North America.
We must all remember that we
can’t catch a large fish, such as a fifty-inch
muskellunge, if we are not fishing a body of water that
has at least a minute population of them. In other words
don’t expect a fifty-incher if it doesn’t
swim in the lake (or body of water) that you are fishing.
Sounds logical? For this factor please input the number
of bodies of water you think have a fifty-inch muskie
population (or at least one fifty-inch muskie) swimming
in it.
Scientists suggest that about
1/3 of the known muskie lakes have the ability to contain
at least one fifty-inch muskellunge in them. However
this fraction represents the number of lakes that actually
do have a fifty-inch muskellunge swimming in it, not
the possibility of the occurrence. Some environments
can’t sustain a fifty-inch fish biologically.
There may not be enough forage or space for this size
of fish in its environment. Remember that this fish
is at the very top of the food chain. There is only
a certain amount of biomass a lake, river, or stream
can handle. Fifty-inch muskie are rare in most waters
and some waters won’t have one at all. We would
like to believe that there is always one on the body
of water we are fishing, but this in fact may not be
true. Also remember that a fifty-inch muskellunge is
a product of both its environment, and genetics. The
body of water that you fish might be short on one or
the other attribute.
ft= the fraction of time you
spend fishing the known fifty-inch bodies of water in
your life.
This number is bias to each
individual angler. This fraction stands for the amount
of time you actually spend in your life fishing a known
fifty-inch body of water. This is not comprehensive
percent of the time you spend fishing, only the time
spent on a known fifty-inch lake, river, stream, creek,
or pond. After all, you can’t catch a fifty-inch
fish if you don’t spend part of your angling experience
fishing in a body of water with some sort of fifty-inch
muskie population. In other words don’t go to
a numbers lake looking for a haug,. Statically there
is a very minute chance of you catching one. Go to the
lake that contains large numbers of bigger fish, even
though in actuality it may have fewer fish.
na= the number of fifty-inch
muskie swimming in the lake you are fishing.
Some scientists base this on
a lakes biomass. There should only be a minute number
of fish in the very top of the food chain. This number
should be fairly low in respect to the number of acres
and the amount of water the body of water holds. Keep
in mind most scientists recommend no more than 1 fifty-inch
fish per “X “ acres of water. It is also
important to remember that water volume is a factor.
A three hundred-acre lake might be one hundred feet
deep. Another three hundred-acre lake might only be
fifteen feet deep. The one hundred-foot deep lake holds
more water volume and therefore has more space for several
fifty-inch fish to live. The total volume of the lake
should be taken into consideration when factoring this.
fh= the fraction of time you
spend effectively covering a fifty-inch’ers habitat
or home range while on that lake.
This number represents the fraction
of time you effectively cover known fifty-inch muskie
habitat while on the lake. This means that your lure
is free of weeds, properly tuned, and working efficiently.
You should probably factor out how long the lure is
out of the water if casting. Only include the fraction
of the time you spend in the best muskellunge habitat,
and one that you suspect to contain a fifty-inch fish.
Scientists estimate it to take 10,000 cast and 18 hours
of fishing to catch just one muskie. Any idea how many
hours (or casts) it takes before you get your first
fifty-inch muskie?
ff= the fraction of time a fifty-inch
muskie spends feeding (hunting).
This fraction can be a fairly
close estimate based on a fifty-inch muskie’s
activity. In warmer water a muskie’s metabolism
increases and therefor it must feed more often to satisfy
its energy needs. In late fall we know that as the water
cools a muskie becomes less active. It’s metabolism
decreases with water temperature. It will not need to
feed as much in winter. During the production of eggs
and throughout the spawning effort the metabolism must
increase again. Professor David Whal of the Natural
History Survey Illinois, has done extensive work on
muskellunge metabolism levels and their relation to
water tempature. His findings show that water temperature
has a dramatic effect on muskellunge activity.
fc= the fraction of fifty-inch
fish that actually make contact with the lure.
This fraction takes into account
the number of times a fifty-inch fish misses the bait.
Your bait may be in the strike zone, and the fish may
be hungry but this may not be enough to actually get
hooks into the fish. We must take into consideration
the fraction of error by the fish actually successfully
catching its dinner. Studies show that smaller fish
actually miss feeding opportunities about ½ the
time. Some might assume that a fish didn’t get
as big as they do by missing feeding opportunities.
We might also want to assume that bigger fish learn
over the years how to better accomplish life functions
such as feeding. Experience is to longevity as longevity
is to survival. However, big fish can be klutzy. Their
sheer size doesn’t necessarily help them effectively
hide and hunt. There is no question they don’t
digest all of the feeding opportunities. Some baitfish
(and lures) must get away. Anglers count on this not
being their presentation. This part of the equation
also takes into consideration what your lure (or live
bait) looks like to the fish. Does it look palatable?
fb= the fraction of fifty-inch
fish that are actually landed.
This is fraction represents
human error during the capture, and could quite possibly
be one of the biggest factors in the equation. It takes
into consideration terminal tackle such as rod, reel,
drag, line, leader, knot, snap, lure, hooks, split rings,
hook hangers, exc. I can honestly say that I have lost
(for sure) two fifty-inch muskie in my life. I have
successfully landed six fifty-inch muskie in my life.
My record is six and two. Not bad considering! This
part of the equation takes into consideration every
fifty-inch muskie ever hooked and the percentages of
those fish that actually were landed. I estimate the
“hook-up” number to be very low and the
number of “losses” to be very high.
N =
When factoring in all of the
above variables one can calculate his success level
of obtaining the ultimate goal, … a fifty-inch
muskellunge. This formula was based on Drake’s
Formula. With the correct numbers it will give you the
right answer. Some variables that you plug into the
formula may be just guesses. Remember, the closer your
accuracy is, the more correct the outcome will become.
Drake used his formula to accurately predict the possibility
of intelligent life on other planets. The Rusteberg
Formula will help you catch more fifty-inch fish. If
all of the above variables are taken into consideration
next time you are on the water you will definitely have
a better chance at catching that “fish of a lifetime”.
Good luck, with your obsession.
|