Release Rage
By: Steven James Rusteberg
Some of the “elders”
in this industry remember a day when all muskies captured
while angling became shore lunch or even the main course
at a fancy northwoods lodge banquet. Many muskie were
landed by shooting or even clubbed into submission by
talented muskie hunters. That day has gone now, and
another era of fisherman has set precedence. All fish
will be released regardless of size. It has now become
a taboo to even think about keeping a muskie. Many anglers
who keep a personal record go to great lengths to keep
their trophy catch quiet, so that they are not shunned
by the masses. In most “muskie circles”
killing a muskie is just not acceptable practice anymore
unless it is a State or World Record. Some muskie anglers
are even taking this to the next level, having certified
scales near a launch sight in order to release a record
fish.
Muskie hunters have an unusual
gift given to them. Unlike conventional game hunters
we have the ability to capture and carefully release
our prey unharmed to tangle with another day. Over the
years of the “total release mentality” anglers
have developed many opinions about just how a proper
release should take place. Hand-landing, gaffing, cradling
or netting have now become the rage in muskie chat rooms,
at muskie organization meetings, and general bar room
discussion. Which release method is best and safest
not only for the fish but the fisherman? The discussions
get heated at times. I have seen arguments and nasty
words exchanged over this topic alone. How should we
release a muskie?
I remember an incident of what I call “release
rage” several years ago. I was fishing Pewaukee
Lake back in the summer of 1993. It was a beautiful
afternoon. The sun was shining, birds were chirping,
and best of all the muskie were biting. I had a young
friend of mine in the boat that day. Bobby was fourteen
years old and had very little experience with muskies.
He was excited about the trip and even more excited
about the inevitability that he was bound to hook into
the king of fresh water game fish that day. His first
fish was a 41 incher he caught with his father in Northern
Wisconsin. Bobby, at this young age, was dreaming of
buying a boat even before his first car. He had muskies
in is blood. Many of you can relate to this story. That
day on Pewaukee was the best of conditions, but one
angler decided to ruin it for us.
Bobby hooked into a 38 incher
and fought the fish to the boat. I was instructing him
that the water temperature was in the low seventies
and we would have to attempt to net the fish as soon
as we got it close enough. I was concerned about exhausting
the fish in the warmer water period. This puts undo
stress on the fish and can create release problems.
Bobby successfully fought the fish and after a brief
battle. I landed the fish for him in a net on the side
of the boat. As we were getting the hooks out, I hear
an angry voice off in the distance. Keeping the muskies
head in the water while I removed the hooks I heard
a boat rapidly approaching us. Seconds later a boat
came screaming up to the side of us, seemingly upset.
The fellow angler began yelling at us for landing the
fish in the net. He cussed us up and down about our
release method, and proceeded to tell Bobby that his
fish was good as dead. According to this angler we should
have fought the fish to the boat and hand-landed the
fish because, according to him, the fishes slime coat
was gone and the fish would surely dye.
The opinionated angler ruined
our day. We thought we were handling the fish with tender
loving care. I have been tagging fish for years in order
to study growth, movement, and overall health of release
methods. Although my work is not credited as “scientific
works” I was pretty confinident my release methods
were one of the best. Only two fish out of over five
hundred releases were found floating dead, and hundreds
have been recaptured as many as five separate times.
I am convinced my release methods work, but my purpose
of this article is not to sway your opinion that a net
is the only way to release a muskie. I simply want to
list the benefits of different release methods. I want
to encourage fellow anglers to help each other learn
proper handling of muskie. The days of laying the fish
in the bottom of the boat regardless of landing method
are over. A thrashing fish can likely be an internally
damaged fish, and most educated anglers have come to
realize this.
Coincidentally, I think we give
muskies too much credit for being fragile. Although,
I would never abuse a fish, treating it like breakable
fine china is a little ridiculous. I have seen even
the most mishandled fish live to fight another day.
Again, I would never encourage the mistreatment of a
fish, but they are not as breakable as one might think.
Muskies are tough! I think that the Department of Natural
Resources would agree with me, however, probably not
publicly because they want everyone to treat the resource
with “TLC”.
Lets look at some different release
methods pros and cons:
Water Release (Hand-Landing):
In my opinion I have never been
a proponent of water releasing muskie. There are several
advantages to this method, but the overall technique
has many drawbacks. I feel that the effort it takes
to get a fish to the boat in order to get the hooks
removed, many times, exhausts the muskie. This is especially
troublesome when water temperatures exceed seventy degrees
as it often does where I live. An exhausted muksie is
a disadvantaged fish. The muskies overall chance of
survival has been lowered the more energy it expenses
during a fight. I find this to be the biggest drawback.
Also, it often takes longer to water release a fish
than other methods giving the fish the advantage of
time in order to throw the hooks. Some advantages of
a water released fish are that it never leaves its natural
environment. No slime coat is removed, and typically
no split fins or physical damage occurs. However, sometimes
angler’s hands are very venerable to hooks and
injury. It is an excellent method if the angler can
minimize the length of the fight (especially in warmer
water).
Gaffing:
Gaffing muskie has gained popularity,
especially in Canada. Many anglers feel that it is the
only safe way to land a fish (when done properly). Advantages
include not having to ever physically handle the fish.
Most of the time the slime coat remains intact and split
fins are not an issue. A gaff takes up very little room
in the boat, and can be stored away in a safe place
where the angler is not likely to poke themselves. Disadvantages
include permanent scarring, holes in the jaw membrane,
and risk to the fish of infection. The body of the fish
is vertical not horizontal in the water which can be
abnormal for the fishes torso. When gaffing, a fishes
head is often times above the water for long periods
of time while the angler removes the hooks. The fish
often times has the advantage of time in the water in
order to throw the hooks. Gaffing is defiantly a learned
technique. Practice is necessary in order to properly
gaff in the lower jaw of the muskie.
Cradling:
Cradling is an excellent way
of landing a muksie. Cradles come in many different
sizes and styles, and can be generally found in most
sport shops and tackle catalogs. The cradles popularity
has gained momentum in the last ten years. A muskie
is totally supported throughout it entire body length
in a cradle. A fish in a cradle has restricted movement
so it is uncommon for it to cause bodily harm to itself.
A cradel is bulkier than a gaff, but less bulky than
a net. Many cradles come with a measuring tape printed
on them, making measuring your catch convient. Some
of the disadvantages of a cradle include the loss of
slime on the fish. Typically it removes more of the
slime coat on a muskie than any other method. Cradling
a fish is generally a two-person operation. This limits
the angler whom fishes alone. Cradles are difficult
to use when trying to avoid getting hooks stuck in the
netting, and also often mean fighting a fish longer
than many other methods.
Netting:
Netting fish is my landing technique
of choice. I feel that I can cut down on the time a
fish expends its energy in the water considerably. Netting
a “green fish” is the easiest way to cut
down on energy expensed in a warm water situation. This
can ensure your catch will have the energy to “reposition
itself” in order to feed and recover from any
trauma experience. Fish can be keep in the water beside
the boat and never leave its natural environment. Hooks
can be removed in the net in a restricted area where
the fish’s head never comes above the water level.
The muskie generally spends the least amount of time
out of the water with this method, but the technique
is not without flaws. Netting can remove significant
amounts of slime coat. Fins can be damaged and often
bleed when the harsh netting contacts the fish. Nets
tend to be one of the most bulky landing methods available
and take up a great deal of space in the boat.
Fisherman’s attitudes
have taken a dramatic change over the last 50 years.
At one time killing a muskie was the norm. Now anglers
look into the future for a new World Record. The majority
of fisherman have realized that without catch and release
the vision of a seventy-pound fish will dramatically
decrease over time. Release methods are under scrutiny
as fisherman become more alarmed about how a proper
release method should be preformed. What we all need
to remember is that we are all working for the same
outcome, a healthy release. We all want every muskie
we catch to fight again another day and possibly live
long enough to reach gigantic proportions. There is
nothing wrong with discussing a muskie fisherman’s
options when it comes to healthy releasing a muskie,
but experiencing “release rage” over a person
making an effort to put a fish back into the lake is
not “ healthy” for our sport. Use the technique
that works best for you, and never criticize another
angler for his style. Teach each other proper conservation.
|