Nomad
Muskies, A Spillway Problem:
From The Chain, Down The Fox (60+ Mile Swim)
By: Steven James Rusteberg
From the time I started studying the Muskellunge, research
has pointed to populations of adult fish occupying a
“home range.” Muskellunge have always been
thought of as homebodies, never leaving an area they
deemed to be their territory. This “home range”
theory, is what I would like to challenge. We currently
have adult Muskellunge traveling over 60+ miles from
the Fox Chain O’ Lakes, down the Fox River. This
is not just a small movement of adult fish. By the hundreds,
from the time we started putting fish in the Fox Chain,
Muskie have been traveling great distances through this
waterway.
Several years ago , a man named Mike Murphy approached
me down by the Yorkville, Illinois dam and stated that
he was catching several Muskie in the area. I listened
with disbelief, shrugging the information off as a person
who didn’t know the difference between a Northern
Pike and a Muskellunge. Just three years later , I learned
that this guy “Mike” hadn’t lost all
his marbles. A picture of a Muskie surfaced at a local
bait shop along the river, with the dam clearly in the
background. Eureka, hard core evidence at least one
Muskie had made it out of the Fox Chain and continued
to swim over 60+ miles down the Fox River.
MORE MUSKIES THAN WE THOUGHT.....
I immediately called Mike Murphy to get further information
on his discoveries. This time he came forward with pictures....
not just one picture, but several.... fish after fish,
after fish. My first comment to him was “does
anyone know about this?” He seemed to think (and
was right) that only some locals know the full extent
of the Fox River Muskie factory. Not even the DNR knew
that they were traveling from the Fox Chain (point of
origin), well past the Yorkville Dam.
Adding to the Muskie population down river was Shabbona’s
own Indian Creek Spillway. For years the Shabbona Sportsman
Club, and the Quad County Hawg Hunters ( Plano Chapter
of Muskies Inc.) have rescued hundreds of fish which
have, unknowingly to anglers, sought current and washed
over the dam. A good number of theses fish swam through
two inches or less of water in order to make it all
the way to the Fox River. There they thrive on the White
Sucker populations and the abundant current they traveled
so far to inhabit.
WHY MUSKIES MOVE.....
It has not been scientifically determined why Muskies
seek current areas. Some attribute this to the origin
of the Muskellunge being a river species. Only later
in the history of the fish, did some become trapped
in lakes where they resides today. Others, believe in
the “magnetic compass theory.” Like the
Carrier Pigeon, the Muskellunge may have some way of
knowing exactly where it is in a body of water, and
where it wants to go. Some think that the fish follows
food, and will travel with the bait wherever it goes.
No matter what the reason, Muskie are attracted to current
and will travel in order to seek it. This is why it
is so important we understand the repercussions of stocking.
THE THREAT OF MUSKIES ON THE
MOVE.....
Muskies have traveled down the Fox River for 60+ miles
and are currently moving up small creeks into “non-muskie”
bodies of water. If there is current, cooler water,
or lake access Muskie will inhabit the area. The DNR
must take this into consideration when stocking any
body of water. This has not been done in past stockings,
thus, several bodies of water have unintentionally been
contaminated with Muskie. If it is connected..... they
will swim! The Fox River proves that distance is no
object, depth is no object, and size (fish or water
body) is no object. Encourage your Division of Fisheries
to do research before indiscriminate stocking takes
place. If there is a way out of the body of water, the
Muskie will find it and travel it.
WHAT CAN WE DO ABOUT IT?
Muskie have been stocked in bodies of water without
discretion. Most of these bodies of water are reservoirs.
Most reservoirs are dammed up at at least one end. Without
a fish spillway barrier the fish will (and have) leave
the lake of stocking origin. Stocking a body of water
without fish barriers is a waste of money. Muskies Inc.,
and the DNR have wasted moneys for years. This has to
stop! Muskies continue to swim over the following spillways
in great numbers because of the lack of a fish barrier:
SHABBONA: exit Indian Creek /
destination Strip Mines (private property).....swimming
further......Fox RIVER......swimming further...... Illinois
River (and all tributaries leading to ponds and lakes).
Hundreds of documented fish already went over the dam.
Throughout Shabbona Park’s Indian Creek, a NO
FISHING ordinance in effect to prevent poaching ((snagging))
of Muskie. Please note that this is a nonviable fish
population. Anglers can’t fish below spillway
or private property that extends for tens of miles beyond
the lake... Afish barrier installed in August 1998.
Will it work?
EVERGREEN: exit spillway/ destination private property
and small ponds....this is not a fishable population.
Again, much of the water is private property on a creek
you can jump across. Most Muskie will die looking for
deeper holes, in the warm water and hot sun. Hundreds
of fish have been saved by DNR and restocked in lake,
but effort is frivolous without a spillway barrier.
Many fish will go over again, along with others looking
for current. This is a waste of TIME AND MONEY until
a barrier is put into place, yet, $8000 will be part
of a stocking effort in FALL OF 1998! Don’t waste
our money DNR! Put a fish barrier in place before you
continue to stock...
FOX CHAIN: exit all creeks and
Fox River/ destination every body of water connected.
Dams such as Algonquin, Elgin, Batavia, Yorkville, and
so on have reported more catches every year. Creeks
such as Boone, Flint, Spring, Ferson, Mill, Big Rock,
and Little Rock now have Muskellunge spawning and swimming
in them. Some of these creeks and lakes have become
threatened with a new member of the food chain (the
Muskie) inhabiting them. Protected natural populations
of fish will be threatened by this predator.
SHELBYVILLE: exit spillway/ destination
Kaskaskia River to Lake Carlyle...Fish have already
been caught in good numbers just below the spillway
on Shelbyville. Some fish have made it to Carlyle and
numbers will increase as time goes by. This is one of
the few fishable escaping populations. In time even
if Carlyle lake is never stocked with Muskie, it will
become a trophy fishery. The Kaskaskia River has already
become one.
OTTER : exit spillway / destination
Hodges Creek ... Fish have been known to go over this
spillway since the first stocked Muskie population existed.
Until 1996, nothing was done about the problem. A temporary
fish barrier was put up, but shortly after construction
it came down due to high water. It was never reinstalled
. Fish continue to go over in large number in spring.
Continuing to stock this body of water is a waste of
money without a fish barrier in place. Nothing will
become of the Muskie washing over this spillway but
Seagull food. Those that do survive, are on private
property and are inaccessible to the common angler.
KINKAID: barrier in place after
District Manager of DNR recognized hundreds over spillway
in 1996. An example of quick action by concerned official,
...... (Hats off to him!) Give this DNR Fisheries Biologist
a raise! With a quick decision in 1997, and request
for funds, the fish fence was put in place. Since it’s
construction, hundreds of adult fish have been saved
from going over the spillway. A good example of quick
government!
DNR DON’T WASTE OUR MONEY!
One of the major points we have to get across to our
Springfield Division of Fisheries, is that we will not
tolerate this indiscriminate waste of money. When fish
go over a spillway they become waste, unless they fall
into a viable fishery in which the angler can reap the
benefits. A stream you can jump across is not a fishable
waterway. When these fish go over a spillway and unintentionally
populate lakes and streams that are connected, this
is not an expectable circumstance! Stocking more Muskie
to compensate for “spillway loss” is not
an acceptable practice. Don’t stop the leek in
the dam with chewing gum. Prevent these fish from going
over in the first place! Don’t stock any fish
until fish barriers are in place or you are wasting
our money and fish.
HOW BIG IS THE NOMAD MUSKIE PROBLEM
How big is this spillway problem?
Let me attempt to do the math. Let’s say we stock
one Muskie per acre into Shabbona Lake each year. This
is the objective of the DNR. The fingerlings go into
the lake at size 10-14 inches long. Let us round Shabbona’s
size to 300 acres big. The first year 300 fish are put
into the lake. Let’s say that there is no mortality
on these 300 baby Muskie (research shows at 10-14 inches
we can expect 60%+ mortality). The spring comes and
we loose 47 fish over the dam. How did I get the number
“47?”. Forty-seven fish were recovered during
one rescue in 1996 by Quad County Chapter of Muskies
Inc.. Many more were below the spillway that couldn’t
be rescued because of a manpower issue.
Size of lake : 300 acres
Number stocked : 300 Muskies
Number Lost over Spillway on first high water of spring:
47
Total percent of population: 15% or roughly 1/6 of population
NOT A PROBLEM??
Multiply by 3 high water periods (an average spring):
1/3 population
Total Cost of fish : $12 a fish x 300 fish = $3600
Total Dollar Loss For Year : $1200 or 1/3 of moneys
spent
(keep in mind this represents no mortality)
THE WHOLE PICTURE
The numbers above are just to illustrate the problem,
they do not represent scientific numbers. A true scientific
formula would contain values for fish mortality, including
perdition, disease, and angler harvest. However, this
problem is worse on some spillways (i.e. Evergreen Lake)
than I have represented. Loosing up to (or more than)
1/3 of a population on any given year has serious repercussions
to a fishery. For example members from the Plano chapter
of Muskies Inc. rarely fish Shabbona anymore. Why? Due
to the lake “falling off” the stocking program
for four years, and fish falling over the spillway,
numbers of midsize fish are at an all time low. Manpower
hours in order to catch one fish, have more than doubled
over the last four years. Unless your looking for a
state record (high odds) there is no reason to work
this hard for a fish. Lesson: don’t stock a lake
without a fish fence or loose a good percentage of what
you stock over the dam.
CONCLUSION:
There is an easy solution to
what I have just presented to you above. Don’t
stock fish into a body of water with a way out. Muskie
will always be attracted to current and without a spillway
barrier to prevent them from leaving they will not stay
where you put them. Stocking Muskie without a fish fence
is a terrible waste of money and fish. Politics play
into many of the issues above, but let’s do what
is best for the fisherman and the fisheries. Lack of
money and manpower is no longer a good excuse. Grant
money can be obtained by any “environmentally
friendly” company or organization. They, in turn,
use it as a tax write off and a chance to say they were
involved with something good for Mother Nature. Sportsman
need to take advantage of this friendly donation. Companies
like Miller Brewing, have given gracious donations to
“The Pewaukee Project” in Wisconsin and
should be recognized for their financial involvement.
Manpower from organizations such as Muskies Inc., The
Illinois Muskie Alliance, Sportsman Clubs, and private
organizations should not be hard to come by. Use these
resources to solve the fish barrier problem, but don’t
stock fish until it is accomplished.
|